Introduction
『ファーストラヴ』is a mystery novel that won the Naoki Prize in 2018, one of the most prestigious prizes for popular fiction.
I never read Rio Shimamoto before, and I chose 『ファーストラヴ』because it won the prize.
There is an NHK drama adaptation of the novel and a film adaptation is scheduled for 2021, see more here.
Review
I will say it plainly, I did not like 『ファーストラヴ』. Even though it won the prestigious Naoki Prize, this novel clearly has flaws to me.
The plot of the novel is about the young Kanna who was arrested for the murder of her father. Our protagonist is the psychologist Yuki Makabe who is writing a nonfiction book about Kanna.
The plot surrounding the murder was interesting and clever. I enjoyed seeing the investigation unfold and this is what kept me reading.
However, I found that the characters had no depth at all and were not interesting. This is particularly true concerning our protagonist, who is also the narrator. I already mentioned it in my reading journal when I first talked about this novel, but it just did not feel like this book is written from the first-person perspective, and it took me a while to get used to the author’s writing style.
At some point, I even started to seriously dislike our protagonist Yuki, and reading became a chore. I couldn’t see what made her apt to write this book about Kanna. We don’t see her work on it or even think about it in a professional way, and I never thought that she was particularly good in her field. More than once, I found the questions she asks clumsy and irritating.
There is also a mechanism that I very often dislike when it appears in mystery novels: when the author deliberately retains information concerning the main character’s past only to create more mystery to the reader. To me, the real mystery is the one that both the reader and the protagonist do not know. If there are constant hints about a previous relationship between two characters, but if the account of it only appears late in the novel, I feel frustrated and ultimately lose interest. The relationship between two characters in 『ファーストラヴ』is presented to the reader in this manner, which I found irritating.
As a result of the characters lacking depth, the parts of the novel that were not about the case were very boring to me. I just did not care about the characters. Even the murder case, which was interesting in itself, suffered a little from the character of Kanna, who I did not find interesting either.
When I read crime fiction, I never expect the characters to have a deep or complex personality or to be allotted long descriptions. I am easily satisfied with credible characters and a good plot. But in 『ファーストラヴ』, I really felt that something was missing.
Another thing that I did not like in the novel is the way different scenes succeed one another without anything binding them together. It looks like nothing happened between two scenes. I mean, just a sentence is enough to link two separate events or even just localise events in time. In 『ファーストラヴ』, it was sometimes hard to tell when a scene took place. Was it the day after the previous part? several days after? what had happened in between? Some scenes that were not directly related to the case felt pointless and unconnected to me, they come out of nowhere and lead nowhere. I found this particularly annoying, and I thought several times of putting the book aside for good.
I have watched the trailer of the NHK drama, but it did not make me want to watch it. However, I will keep an eye on the film adaptation. As I said, the plot was good, so I think that it could be great on screen.
Maybe I was expecting too much from this novel because it won the Naoki Prize…? I am someone who is very easy to satisfy when it comes to crime fiction. I love mystery novels so much, that even if the end is not so good, even if I see flaws here and there, even if some events are not credible, as long as it is entertaining I consider that the novel has done its job. If I had fun reading a mystery novel, I will write an overall positive review and just mention the things that I did not like. But I did not even enjoy reading 『ファーストラヴ』at all.
About
I’m learning Japanese, Korean and Chinese to read detective novels in these languages. I post about my reading progress and language study here. Best way to get in touch is on Mastodon 🙂
Hello! Stumbled upon your blog while looking for the review on this book. The English translation is coming out this year, so I was wondering about it. I thought Naoki winners are usually good, but I guess there are exceptions! I also checked out your other reviews.
I read some of your book review lists. There are some we agree on and some that we disagree. I am a fan of Japanese literature but I rely on translations. I don’t think I know most of the authors you’ve read. I like other genres as well, and within mysteries, I prefer those with social commentaries (like Seicho Matsumoto) rather than hard-boiled or locked-room types.
Like you, I love Hideo Okuda (especially Dr Irabu) and Takahashi Kazuaki.
I also happen to like Onodera Fum’s Hito and Keiichiro Hirano’s “Matinee”. I started out disliking Matinee, then it grew on me. Hirano tends to be preachy in his books, I think.
As for Hito, I think “yasashii” is a coveted trait do for the Japanese, like the protagonist. The other characters, the ways about them is a good reflection of the Japanese people, I think.
It’s hard to find someone to share this interest in Japanese literature. May I share some of what I love?
Mystery wise, I enjoy Yasuo Uchida (especially with Asami Mitsuhiko), Edogawa Rampo, Fuminori Nakamura.
Killing for the prosecution by 雫井修介.
Though his other work “Neighbors” was a real page-turner, but I dislike the characters in it. I prefer the characters in Killing for the Prosecution.
other genres:
Stand in Companion by Kazufumi Shiraishi
(I don’t think there a Japanese version yet… Front what I know, it was commissioned to be published in English first. I could be wrong though)
Voyage through Stars by Yuka Murayama
My Grandpa by Yasutaka Tsutsui
Lion House By Ogawa Ito
Astral season Beastly season by Tahi Saihate
Thank you 😊
Hello! Thank you for your comment!
Yes, I think that both Hito and Matinee have received very good reviews overall, and I am definitely in the minority for not liking them. I’m sure it’s the same for “First Love”, I’m probably the only one who did not like it, maybe I missed what makes this novel stands out. Anyway, I hope you’ll like it when the translation comes out.
I only read one book by Fuminori Nakamura in Japanese, a short novel called 迷宮, but for some reason, I completely forgot to write a review about it. Have you read Cult X? Would you recommend it? I remember finding 迷宮 a bit dark and depressing, so I’m afraid the author’s other novels will be the same. (I also read The Thief in French translation, and I remember really liking it.)
Thank you for recommending Killing for the prosecution! I’ve added it to my list, I’m sure I will like it! I also had a look at the author’s other books, and they all look great, especially the series 犯人に告ぐ (The investigation game). I’ll check out “Neighbours” too. I just started a reading challenge (read 6 books by Seicho Matsumoto before the end of Spring), so I will have to wait before diving into Shusuke Shizukui’s works, but I’m very much looking forward to it 😄
And I’ll definitely try the Asami Mitsuhiko series by Yasuo Uchida!
I will check out the other books you recommended as well! I keep hearing people recommending Ito Ogawa, so even though I’m not sure that this is a genre for me, I will give it a try someday! I also read The Girl who leapt through time by Yasutaka Tsutsui, and loved it.
Thank you for all these recommendations, it’s always nice to talk about Japanese literature! 😄